The tax is estimated to reduce the number of new type 2 diabetes cases by approximately per year. Twenty-five years after the introduction of the tax, there would be 4, fewer prevalent cases of heart disease and 1, fewer persons living with the consequences of stroke, and an estimated extra people would be alive as a result of the tax. The tax would generate an estimated AUD million in revenue each year. Governments should consider increasing the tax on sugared drinks. This would improve population health, reduce health care costs, as well as bring in direct revenue. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The State of Sugar and Health Taxes in | KerryDigest
Soda taxes are being sold as a fix for some pretty big problems: everything from obesity to education funding, and everywhere from San Francisco to Philadelphia to West Virginia. Could these sin taxes really deliver on these promises? Or are proponents glossing over key flaws of these proposals? Proponents sometimes justify this feature of the tax by arguing that it is fine to overtax low-income individuals, as revenue from this tax goes to government services that are enjoyed more by those same low-income individuals. This is poor reasoning, though. If this argument were valid, it could be used to justify any regressive tax imaginable, as government spending as a whole is progressive, benefiting lower-income individuals more than high-income individuals as a percent of their income. A recent study by University of Massachusetts researchers explains the problems with an overly simplistic model of taxation vs.
The science is in: the case for a sugar tax is overwhelming
This is largely a result of change in the composition of drinks but there have also been shifts in consumer purchasing behaviour, with more consumers choosing drinks with low, or no, sugar content. This external scrutiny will hopefully encourage more positive and rapid action by the food industry to achieve healthier diets. The problem is that the numbers driving the headlines are difficult to interpret, and often seem more frightening than they really are.
Baum says that other causes of obesity like people quitting smoking and lacking regular exercise will keep obesity rates high even if the government puts regulations on food. Cassella states that the government sho Although citizens themselves have to make the choice to have a healthier life, the government could give them the push they need to start living a healthy life. Obesity is an epidemic and affects millions of people of the nation of the United States every day.