There is something that bothers me for writting unit tests that test multiple public methods at the same time With a test like in the example, if the method isEmpty fail, you will know it only when you run your unit test by yourself If we write a unit test only to test one purpose, the name of the test will be self-explanatory and when you see your build failed in your Continuous Integration you will know immediatelly what is wrong and what to correct. I think, both kind of approach has its place in unit testing.
C program to create and traverse a Linked List - Codeforwin
Given a singly linked list of characters, write a function that returns true if the given list is a palindrome, else false. This mainly involves three steps. Traverse the given list from head to tail and push every visited node to stack. Traverse the list again. For every visited node, pop a node from the stack and compare data of popped node with the currently visited node.
Given a singly linked list, find the middle of the linked list. If there are even nodes, then there would be two middle nodes, we need to print the second middle element. Method 1: Traverse the whole linked list and count the no.
Linked lists can be thought of from a high-level perspective as being a series of nodes. A linked list, in simple terms, is a linear collection of data elements. These data elements are called nodes. A node is a collection of two sub-elements or parts. A data part that stores the element and a next part that stores the link to the next node.
Some of the Shop Talk videos felt a little unstructured and it wasnt always evident just what they added to the learning experience -- other than reinforcing the topics described in the direct teaching segments.